Philippe Legrain explains why he believes British parliamentarians will in the end backing a deal similar to what they rejected on 15 January.
432 votes to 202. It is the biggest government defeat ever – on the most important piece of legislation of this parliamentary term and many previous ones. However, the most likely scenario is still that the EU Withdrawal Agreement will eventually be approved. Remember it is not just Theresa May’s deal, it is the EU’s deal – the only one on offer.
There is a bewildering number of permutations for what might happen between now and then, but only three final outcomes: Britain will either exit the EU with a deal, exit without a deal, or not exit at all.
The default option is that the UK will leave the EU without a deal on 29 March. If Parliament does not approve the exit deal by then, and the government does not seek and obtain from the EU an extension of the Article 50 exit deadline, the UK will crash out of the EU without a deal (with catastrophic consequences).
Had hardline Conservative Brexiteers won their motion of no confidence in Theresa May last December and succeeded in replacing her as Prime Minister with one of their own, he or she could have run down the clock and the UK might have left the EU without a deal. But they failed. She is now safe until December. And she seems set to persevere in seeking support for the exit deal.
For sure, Tuesday’s vote highlighted the massive opposition to the deeply unsatisfactory compromise deal that the government has agreed with the EU. Hardline Brexiteers and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) would prefer a no-deal Brexit. Many Labour MPs, along with Liberal Democrat, Scottish Nationalist, Plaid Cymru and Green ones, would prefer no Brexit at all, as would a few Conservatives. The Labour leadership supports Brexit but wants a general election. Some moderate Conservatives and Labour MPs would prefer a softer Brexit. Many MPs of all persuasions do not want to take responsibility for the mess Britain is in. So MPs voted against the deal for many different, contradictory reasons.
That inability to agree on a way forward leads some to think a no-deal Brexit will happen by default. But there is also overwhelming parliamentary opposition to such a chaotic, catastrophic outcome. So if faced with a last-minute, cliff-edge, binary choice between deal and no deal, a deal would surely win.
Others suggest that the way forward is a softer Brexit that minimises the economic disruption from leaving. The Labour leadership wants a permanent customs union with the EU. Conservative MP Nick Boles and others tout the Norway Plus option: a customs union plus membership of the single market (except for agriculture and fisheries). But if you think any of those options will ultimately prevail, in effect you agree with me that the exit deal is likely to be approved eventually.
There is still huge confusion about the Brexit process. Parliament is being asked to approve a legally binding Withdrawal Agreement, which covers the terms of Britain’s orderly departure from the EU, notably the financial settlement, EU citizens’ rights and safeguards to keep the Irish border open. That exit deal is bundled with a vague and non-binding Political Declaration on the future relationship with the EU that is already compatible with Labour’s position or indeed the Norway Plus option. In any case, those would need to be negotiated with the EU – and ratified by Parliament – after the UK had left the EU.
Still others have concluded that since Parliament cannot agree on a way forward, the government will eventually feel obliged to ask voters to decide – and they will opt to Remain. Currency markets seem to have jumped to that conclusion: the pound soared as the contours of May’s crushing defeat became clear. But while the chances of a second referendum have increased in recent months, it remains unlikely.
For a second referendum to happen, the government would first need to table the requisite legislation. That would require a successful no-confidence vote that led to a general election that Labour won with Prime Minister Corbyn committed to a second referendum – a very unlikely chain of events.
Or Theresa May might throw her weight behind a People’s Vote. But that seems very unlikely too, since she seems determined to deliver her Brexit deal – her only achievement as prime minister – and reneging on that commitment would enrage Conservative MPs and potentially even lead a handful to vote with Labour to topple the government.
In any case, it is not clear that there is a parliamentary majority for a second referendum. And then there are all the devilish questions about how to conduct a fair referendum with three choices, whose framing and sequencing could lead to different results.
But if and when it becomes clear that a second referendum will not happen, the binary choice applies and deal beats no deal.
There will doubtless be many twists and turns along the way. And of course, I have not covered every eventuality. Accidents can also happen. Unexpected events can intrude. So the risk of a no-deal Brexit is not zero. A second referendum might happen. But the most likely scenario is still that Britain will exit the EU with a deal that looks very much like the one MPs have just overwhelmingly rejected.
Philippe Legrain is a senior visiting fellow at the London School of Economics’ European Institute and the founder of OPEN, an international think-tank on openness issues.
This article was originally published in CapX: https://capx.co/a-variation-on-mays-deal-is-still-the-most-likely-brexit-outcome/
Published in January 2019